It’s possible to choose whether to be liberal or conservative, which is why it’s okay to criticize liberals (qua liberals) and conservatives (qua conservatives). By contrast, it’s not possible to choose whether to be white, black, or any other race, which is why it’s not okay to criticize whites (qua whites), blacks (qua blacks), etc. Well, at least that’s one of the post-World-Wars American ideals: that you should judge people only for their choices, that you shouldn’t judge people for anything outside their control, especially how they were born.

Interestingly, though, there’s no consensus as to what’s choosable. Almost everybody agrees that the individual can’t choose his race. Transracialism isn’t popular. But there are a lot of people who believe, schizophrenically, that the individual can choose whether to be a man or woman.

Either way, my interest in psychology and sociology spans from the choosable to the unchoosable, that is from modeling the world in terms of the choosable, for instance how the postmodernists affect Western society, to the unchoosable, for instance how the Jews (who, incidentally, have been one of the most powerful forces in postmodernism) affect Western society. And for that, I find myself outside the Overton window.