Some of my goals:

1. I not only want to contribute to logic and linguistics but also answer the question of what the relationship is between logic and linguistics.
2. I want to answer the question of what the relationship is between mathematical notation and natural language (especially arithmetical and algebraic notation).
3. I want to (a) integrate Austrian economics, especially Misesian-Hayekian economics, with British empiricism, and then (b) found a field of logic, linguistics, and logico-linguistics which is epistemologically the same as British-empiricist Austrian economics. That is, I want to do logic, linguistics, and logico-linguistics in the spirit of Misesian-Hayekian-Humean economics.
4. I want to design a certain kind of artificial language and in doing so, abstract out the logical substructure of natural language. (If you understand my artificial language, then you’ll also understand my insights in logic, linguistics, and logico-linguistics.)

In testing whether my insights in logic, linguistics, and logico-linguistics are right (including the British-empiricist-Austrian-economics-like epistemology of those fields), I’ll use those insights not only for (a) designing the artificial language—if the artificial language doesn’t work, then I’m wrong—but also (b) studying Japanese, German, etc. That is, the rubber will hit the road in at least two places.