Beyond logic, linguistics, and logico-linguistics

Besides (a) using British empiricism as a foundation for Austrian economics, (b) using that British-empiricist Austrian economics as a model for how to do logic, linguistics, and logico-linguistics, and then (c) using mathematics as a model for how to put the insights that I come up with in those fields into notation à la The Laws of Thought, George Boole (1854), I want to:

  1. Explain how the natural order of civilization uses wheat, rice, milk, tea, coffee, tobacco, and other psychoactives—yes, wheat, rice, and milk are psychoactives, albeit difficult to introspect as such—in order to adapt the mind, which evolved for the pre-civilizational world, to civilization. If you (a) fast periodically, (b) eat, say, only meat, only fruit, or only meat and fruit, and (c) get a lot of exercise outside in the sun, especially in a socially meaningful way, then you’ll be healthy. The problem, though, is that your mind (and indeed your body too) will no longer be adapted to civilization.
  2. More generally, found a new kind of field about health: a field that’s not only about the above (i.e., the natural order of psychoactives) but also about the natural order of the body and its signals to the mind.
  3. Explain male sexual psychology, female sexual psychology, and how the natural order adapts those psychologies to civilization.
  4. More generally, work on the most controversial psychological and sociological questions: the questions of sex, race, and other unchoosable identities.
  5. Explain why there used to be more people like me, people with an interest in the foundational questions of logic, mathematics, etc. And in doing so, tell my story: the story of somebody out of place.
  6. Tell the story of “my people,” whoever they are—that’s one of the questions that I want to answer—especially the story of the World Wars and their aftermath. The World Wars were a catastrophe for the West.